Brrr… It sure is cold this winter (for most of us). Very odd considering all the global warming hysteria. I mean look at this poor camel in Egypt after it snowed for the first time in over 100 years:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/13/cairo-snow_n_4441049.html
In 2006, Al Gore, you released the documentary Inconvenient Truth. It predicted a grave future for the world due to anthropogenic global warming. Your argument was convincing. However, almost 10 years has passed and it’s about time we start validating your predictions. The troubling issue for you is that current experiences are not inline with your predictions. For instance, let’s look at your most iconic vision of the ice caps melting. Checking in on our ice caps, this is what we see:
Another major issue is that you can’t stay consistent with your mantra. You ask all of us to live a more conservative and considerate lifestyle to combat climate change, while you live in a resource-eating hog of a house, ocean-side no less. Either you are willing to sacrifice yourself first when the ocean level rises or you simply can’t practice what you preach.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/17/photos-al-goree-new-8875_n_579286.html#s91230
But the real problem Al Gore is that you taint yourself and your message by making major investments in companies and technology involved in “fixing” global warming. You stand to make a windfall of profits if the policies you are lobbying for and convincing the world are needed are put into place. You may turn out to be 100% correct, but it doesn’t matter as you had to muddy the waters by making investments to the proposed solution you are trying to sell.
http://www.examiner.com/article/al-gore-pushes-global-warming-for-personal-profit
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/business/energy-environment/03gore.html?_r=0
I understand in some places in the U.S. (e.g. west coast) had a warm winter while the rest of the U.S. was in a deep freeze , but the truth is that the earth has been undergoing climate change way before our time. There are elements of nature (e.g. solar cycles) that are beyond our control, which influence our climate. The climate is always in flux. Riding the natural “warm” cycle while claiming it is man-made is clever. It’s nearly impossible to prove it’s man-made or not, while cherry-picking evidence of warm spots implants fear and uncertainty – a recipe to perpetually sell a solution. How about I pick out a few places like the Great Lakes and Niagara Falls where it is abnormally cold and claim man-made global cooling? It’s easy to make the argument with some dramitic photos:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/03/12/great-lakes-ice-cover_n_4899269.html
So how long do we let you keep preaching (and making money) about the man-made global warming theory before it’s decided that you are right or wrong? You should establish a date (2020?) for which we make a final verdict on your hypothesis and if you are wrong, the maintream media should bury your name forever in the arctic ice you claimed should have melted, as you will go down as one of the biggest con-artist of our time. If you want people to change, there needs to be real tangible evidence of man-made global warming and consequences felt. Until it is at least 75% convincing, you need to find another job.

